Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dr. Vivek KumarversusThat Bihar State University Service Commission

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The appeal is dismissed because the petitioner failed to implead the selected candidates and the writ petition was filed after the result, rendering the relief untenable.

Summary

Dr. Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition seeking appointment as Assistant Professor of English, claiming denial of teaching experience marks because his certificate lacked a stamp mohar. The Bihar State University Service Commission argued that the selection process had concluded and the result was published on 8 March 2025. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, noting it was filed after the result and the petitioner had not impleaded the candidates who were selected. On appeal, the Court observed that the petitioner had not made any prior submission to implead those candidates and that filing the petition after the result without doing so was a procedural defect. Consequently, the Court found no illegality in the dismissal and upheld the order, dismissing the letters patent appeal.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed after the publication of selection results, without impleading the candidates selected, can be entertained and the relief granted.
  • Whether the denial of teaching experience marks due to the absence of a stamp mohar on the certificate constitutes an illegal act warranting appointment.

Subjects

  • appointment
  • assistant professor
  • teaching experience marks
  • writ petition
  • impleading parties
  • procedural defect
  • selection process

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Letters Patent Appeal No.640 of 2025
                                       In
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6917 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Dr. Vivek Kumar Son of Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, resident of Purbi
     Kapasiya, Nagdah, P.O. and P.S. - Begusarai, District-Begusarai.

                                                                   ... ... Appellant/s
                                        Versus

1.   That Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School
     Examination Board Academic Building, Buddha Marg, Patna-800001,
     through its Secretary.
2.   The Chairman, Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar
     School Examination Board Academic Building, Buddha Marg, Patna-
     800001.
3.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of
     Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.
4.   The Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash
     Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.
5.   GLA University, Mathura (U.P.) through its Registrar.
6.   The Principal, University Polytechnic, GLA University, Mathura (U.P.).

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Appellant/s   :       Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate
     For the Respondent-BSUC:      Mr. Anjani Kumar Sr. Advocate
                                   Mr. Rohan Sinha, Advocate )
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

      Date : 19-01-2026

                     This letters patent appeal has been filed by the

      appellant, Dr. Vivek Kumar challenging the order dated

      28.04.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge, in CWJC
Patna High Court L.P.A No.640 of 2025 dt.19-01-2026
                                             2/4




         No.6917 of 2025.

                      2.    The writ petition was filed by the appellant with

         the following prayers :-

                               "For commanding and directing the
                  Respondent         Bihar         State   University   Service
                  Commission (Respondents No. 1 & 2) to appoint the
                  petitioner on the post of Assistant Professor in the
                  subject English after awarding him the teaching
                  experience marks of four years i.e. 2 x 4=8 marks
                  which has illegally been denied to the petitioner due
                  to non-availability of stamp mohar on his said
                  teaching experience certificate even though said
                  teaching certificate of petitioner has legally and
                  validly been issued by the Pro-Vice Chancellor as
                  well as the Principal of University Polytechnic, GLA
                  University, Mathura for the period from 25th July,
                  2016 to 28th June, 2020, considering the strong &
                  bright academic background of the petitioner who
                  has done well in the interview held on 05.03.2025
                  after declaring him qualified/successful in all the
                  other round of the selection process".

                      3. The matter was taken on 28.04.2025. The learned

         Single Judge, taking note of the submission made on behalf of

         the Bihar State University Service Commission that the

         selection process for the post of Assistant Professor English

         pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.09.2020 has already

         been concluded and the result has also been published on
Patna High Court L.P.A No.640 of 2025 dt.19-01-2026
                                             3/4




         08.03.2025, came to hold that since the writ petition has been

         filed after publication of result on 24.03.2025, without

         impleading any of the candidates selected for the post of

         Assistant       Professor       English by the select list dated

         08.03.2025, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be

         granted, hence the writ petition was dismissed.

                      4.      The learned counsel for the appellant submits

         that he had orally made a prayer on 28.04.2025, when the

         matter was taken up, to give some time for filing appropriate

         application for impleading the necessary parties, who have

         been selected for the post of Assistant Professor English by

         select list dated 08.03.2025, but time was not granted and the

         impugned order was passed.

                      5.       We do not find anything from the records that

         any such submission was made by the learned counsel for the

         appellant before the learned Single Judge, when the writ petition

         was filed after 16 days of the publication of the result,

         nonetheless it was the duty on the part of the petitioner to

         implead the successful candidates as opposite parties/respondents

         in the writ petition and the same having not been done, we find

         no illegality or perversity in the impugned order so as to be

         interfered with in the limited scope of letters patent appeal.
             Patna High Court L.P.A No.640 of 2025 dt.19-01-2026
                                                          4/4




                      Accordingly, the LPA stands dismissed.

                                   6.      It is open to the appellant to take recourse in

                      accordance with law.


                                            (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                                (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

kanchan/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          20.01.2026
Transmission Date


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.