Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shatrudhan Ray @ Shatrughan Rai @ Satrughan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the Letters Patent Appeal, disposing it as withdrawn.

Summary

Shatrudhan Ray filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The appellant, through counsel, later submitted that the appeal had become infructuous and sought to withdraw it. The State’s counsel was present and did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court considered the submission and, without further hearing, ordered the LPA to be disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal was terminated without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a Letters Patent Appeal may be withdrawn by the appellant after being filed

Subjects

  • Letters Patent Appeal
  • withdrawal
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • infructuous appeal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Letters Patent Appeal No.892 of 2025
                                                    In
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.577 of 2020
                  ======================================================
                  Shatrudhan Ray @ Shatrughan Rai @ Satrughan Rai Son of Late Jaishi Ray
                  @ Jaisi Rai Resident of Village- Chaupar Kala, P.S- Nanpur, District-
                  Sitamarhi
                                                                         ... ... Appellant/s
                                                  Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
                   Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
            2.    The District Magistrate cum Collector, Sitamarhi
            3.    The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi
            4.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sitamarhi
            5.    The Circle Officer, Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi
                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Appellant/s     :       Mr.Sandeep Jha
                  For the Respondent/s    :       Mr.Addl. Advocate General (12)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

                  (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

6    12-03-2026                     Mr. Aditya Jha, learned counsel appearing for the

                    appellant submits that this Letters Patent Appeal has become

                    infructuous and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw this LPA.

                                2. The learned counsel for the State is present.

                                3. In view of such submission, the LPA stands disposed of

                    as withdrawn.


                                         (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                              ( Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

kundan/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.