Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.versusRagini Devi

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The United India Insurance Company appealed against a Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal award ordering it to pay Rs.11,68,000 with interest to the claimants. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Patna High Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the court directed that any statutory amount, if applicable, be returned to the appellant. No substantive merits of the original award were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal filed against a Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal award can be withdrawn by the appellant.

Subjects

  • insurance
  • motor vehicle accident claim
  • appeal withdrawal
  • High Court
  • award
  • interest
  • statutory amount

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     Miscellaneous Appeal No.150 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd. through the Chief
                 Regional Manager and the Constituted Attorney, Regional Office, United
                 India Insurance Company Ltd., Chanakya Commercial Complex, 3rd floor, R-
                 Block, Dist.- Patna.

                                                                             ... ... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    Ragini Devi W/o- Late Amar Nath Soni Resident of Muhalla- Charkhamba
                 Galli, Jail Road, Ara, P.S.- Ara Nagar, Distt.- Bhojpur, Pincode- 802301.
           2.    Brajesh Kumar Singh, S/o- Shankar Singh R/o- Village- Sundarpur,
                 Varanasi, Rajendra Bihar Colony, Lanka, Holding no.- 8/62 DLC, P.S.-
                 Lanka, District- Varanasi (U.P.), Pincode- 221005, (Owner cum Driver of the
                 Vehicle).

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s      :      Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Vikram, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s     :      Mr.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   19-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                               2. The present appeal has been preferred:

                                                 “against the Judgment dated 19-03-

                                        2024 & award dated 01-04-2024 passed by the

                                        learned court of Motor vehicle Accident Claim

                                        Tribunal-cum- Additional District Judge -XVII,

                                        Bhojpur, Ara in Claim case no. 17/2013 whereby

                                        the claim of the claimants has been allowed and

                                        directed the O.P. No.1, United India Insurance

                                        Company ltd. to make payment of Rs.11,68,000/-

                                        to the claimant alongwith interest @ 6% p a
            Patna High Court MA No.150 of 2025(4) dt.19-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                         from the date of filing of this case till the date of

                                         payment within a period of 90 days from the date

                                         of information of the award.”


                                   3. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Vikram, learned counsel for

                      the appellant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the

                      appeal.

                                   4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                   5. Statutory amount if any, has to be returned to the

                      appellant.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.