Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd.,versusFuliya Devi

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The appellant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company, filed a miscellaneous appeal against the award dated 13.08.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge‑7 (Motor Accident Claim Tribunal) in claim case no. 18/20, which allowed compensation against it. The appeal sought relief from the tribunal's decision. During the hearing, the appellant’s counsel indicated a desire to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as infructuous. Consequently, any statutory amount, if payable, must be returned to the insurance company.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal filed by the insurer can proceed when the appellant seeks to withdraw it as infructuous

Subjects

  • insurance
  • motor accident claim
  • compensation
  • appeal
  • infructuous
  • High Court

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Miscellaneous Appeal No.261 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd., At 2nd Floor, Krishna
                 Bhawan, Dakbanglow Road, Patna, Appeal and Appellant through Authorized
                 Signatory/Duly Constituted Attorney, ICICI Lombard General Insurance
                 Company Limited, 2nd Floor, Krishna Bhawan, Above Axis Bank, Near
                 Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1.

                                                                            ... ... Appellant/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    Fuliya Devi Wife of Late Randhir Sahni, Resident of Village- Randaha, P.O.-
                 Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           2.    Devanand Sahni Son of Late Randhir Sahni, Resident of Village- Randaha,
                 P.O.- Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           3.    Mala Kumari Son of Late Randhir Sahni, Resident of Village- Randaha,
                 P.O.- Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           4.    Nitish Kumar Son of Late Randhir Sahni, Resident of Village- Randaha,
                 P.O.- Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           5.    Ram Ashray Sahni Son of Late Randhir Sahni, Resident of Village-
                 Randaha, P.O.- Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           6.    Babni Devi Wife of Ram Ashray Sahni, Resident of Village- Randaha, P.O.-
                 Balatarh, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali.
           7.    Uday Kumar Singh Son of Baleshwar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O-
                 Salha, P.S- Jandaha, District- Vaishali. (Owner).
           8.    Nagendra Rai Son of Raghunandan Rai, Resident of Village and P.O-
                 Rahimapur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali, (Driver).

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s    :        Mr.Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   08-01-2026                 Heard Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

                   the appellant and the State.

                               2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                            (i) being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with
         Patna High Court MA No.261 of 2025(4) dt.08-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                                           the    Judgment/Award      dated    13.08.2024,

                                           passed by Smt. Jyoti Kumari, Additional

                                           District     Judge-7-   Cum-Motor       Accident

                                           Claim       Tribunal,   Vaishali   at   Hajipur

                                           (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in

                                           Claim Case no. 18/20 'Fuliya Devi and Ors.

                                           v/s Uday Kumar Singh and Ors.' by which

                                           compensation has been allowed against the

                                           appellant.

                                3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

                   withdrawal of the petition submitting that it has now become

                   infructuous.

                                4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.

                                5. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned to

                   the Company.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.