Patna High Court
Legal Manager S. B. I . General Insurance Company LimitedversusUrmila Devi and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The court permitted the appellant to withdraw the petition and disposed of the appeal.
Summary
The appellant, S.B.I. General Insurance Company Limited, filed a miscellaneous appeal against a judgment dated 25 June 2018 of the Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patna, in claim case No. 84 of 2015. The appellant claimed to be aggrieved by the tribunal's decision and sought relief from the High Court. During the hearing, it was conveyed that the dispute had already been settled before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal itself. The court allowed the appellant to withdraw the petition in view of this settlement. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of, with a direction that any statutory amount, if applicable, be returned.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellant may withdraw the petition and have the appeal disposed of on the ground that the matter is already settled before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
Subjects
- Miscellaneous Appeal
- Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
- Withdrawal of Petition
- Settlement
- Insurance Claim
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.841 of 2018
======================================================
Legal Manager S. B. I . General Insurance Company Limited
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Urmila Devi Wife of Late Krishna Rai,
2. Shila Kumari, D/o Late Krihna Rai,
3. Shashi Bhusan Kumar, Son of Late Krishna Rai,
4. Deepak Kumar, Son of Late Krishna Rai,
5. Pushpa Kumari, D/o Late Krishna Rai, All resident of Village- Hulasi Tola,
P.O.- Hulasi Tola, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.
6. Anwar, Son of Nathu, Resident of Village- 97A, Gandhi Nagar, Kanpur, at
present Village- Sikandara, P.S.- Khassikandra Kanpur, Dehat U.P.
7. Shashi Kant, Son of Bhagwan Das, Resident of Village- Sanfar, P.S.-
Auraiya, District- Auraiya U.P..
8. Subhash Chandra Bansal, Son of O.P. Bansal, Resident of Village- Cinema
Hall Road, Birmitrapur Sundargarh, Odhisa.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.1, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 12-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present appeal has been preferred for the
following relief(s):
“Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with
the judgment dated 25.06.2018 passed by the
Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Patna in claim case No. 84 of
2015, the appellant prefer this appeal.”
3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court MA No.841 of 2018(3) dt.12-02-2026
2/2
appellant that the matter now stood settled before the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal itself and as such, he may be
permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Permission accorded.
5. Accordingly, the MA No. 841 of 2018 stands
disposed of.
6. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
Checking your session…