Patna High Court
Shohan MishraversusThe State of Bihar through Shree S. Sidharth the Principal Secretary Department of Education
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request after compliance with the order.
Summary
A group of petitioners filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and several officials, alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The respondents complied with the order, after which the petitioners, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the contempt petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the contempt order had been satisfied and requested withdrawal. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the contempt allegations were adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a contempt petition after compliance with the contempt order?
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of petition
- compliance with order
- high court
- civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1134 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11815 of 2024
======================================================
1. Shohan Mishra Son of Late Sharan Mishra, resident of Village-Thadhi, P.S.-
Andhara-Thadhi, District-Madhubani.
2. Yshodanand Mishra, Son of Chandra Kishor Mishra, resident of Village-
Mangrauni, P.S.-Rajnagar, District-Madhubani.
3. Nitaya Nand Jha, son of Radha Kant Jha, resident of Village-Viduliya, P.S.-
Andhara-Thadhi, District-Madhubani.
4. Shiv Shankar Thakur, Son of Late Lakhan Thakur, resident of Village-
Lakhnaur, District-Madhubani.
5. Shambhu Nath Jha, son of Dhairya Narayan Jha, Resident of Village-
Singiaun, P.S.-Rajnagar, District-Madhubani.
6. Rakesh Jha, Son of Naresh Jha, resident of Village-Rahika, P.S.-Rahika,
District-Madhubani.
7. Chandrakala Devi, Wife of Late Prayag Jha, resident of Village-Satghara,
P.S.-Babubarhi, District-Madhubani.
8. Umesh Chandra Mishra, Son of Late Suraymani Mishra, resident of Village-
Satghara, P.S.-Babubarhi, District-Madhubani.
9. Jay Prakash Thakur, Son of Shree Narayan Thakur, resident of Village-
Belmohan, P.S.-Phulparash, District-Madhubani.
10. Indira Devi, Wife of Late Binod Nand Mishra, resident of Village-
Narpatnagar, P.S.-Sakri, District-Madhubani.
11. Ganga Devi, Wife of Gyanand Jha, resident of Village-Harinagar, Raghuni
Dehat, P.S.-Rajnagar, District-Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Shree S. Sidharth the Principal Secretary
Department of Education Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Shri Sachindra Kumar, father name not known to the petitioners, the Special
Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Shree Arvind Kumar Verma, father name not known to the petitioners, the
District Magistrate, Madhubani, District-Madhubani.
4. Shree Javed Alam, father name not known to the petitioners, the District
Education Officer cum District Planning Officer, Madhubani, District-
Madhubani.
5. Shree Mritunjay Kumar, father name not known to the petitioners, the
District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani, District-Madhubani.
6. Shree Javed Alam, father name not known to the petitioners, the District
Programme Officer, Madhubani, District-Madhubani.
7. Shree Ajay Yadav, father name not known to the petitioners, the Chairman,
Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.
Patna High Court MJC No.1134 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026
2/2
8. Shree Niraj Kumar, father name not known to the petitioners, the Secretary
Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Pleader 23
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 13-02-2026 At the outset, Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, learned
Advocate for the petitioners submits that the order under
contempt has been complied and, as such, on instruction, he
seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition.
2. Learned Advocates for the opposite parties are
present.
3. In view thereof, the present contempt petition
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/-
U
Checking your session…