Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Smt. Laxmi DeviversusThe State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Principal Secretary, General Administration Department,

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Laxmi Devi, filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and the Principal Secretary, alleging deliberate violation of a June 21, 2017 order in CWJC No. 12160/16 issued by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah. The petition sought punishment of the Principal Secretary for the alleged contempt. During hearing on March 12, 2026, counsel for the petitioner indicated that the matter had become infructuous and requested withdrawal of the petition. The Court accepted the request and dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn. Consequently, no further orders or penalties were imposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt petition may be dismissed on the ground that it has been withdrawn by the petitioner

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court order
  • punishment for contempt

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1153 of 2018
                                                       In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1744 of 2018
                 ======================================================
                 Smt. Laxmi Devi Wife of Sri Mahendra Kumar, D/o Late Manki Sao at
                 present Chairman, Zila Parishad, Gaya, R/o Village- Bumer, P.O.- Jagir
                 Barachatti, PS and Block- Barachatti, District- Gaya.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Principal Secretary, General
                 Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna (S/o not known to
                 the petitioner).
           2.    Amir Subhani, S/o not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, General
                 Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvy, AC to AAG-3
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   12-03-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                              (i) for punishing the opposite party no. 2

                                              Principal Secretary, General Administration

                                              Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna for

                                              knowingly and deliberately violating the

                                              order passed on 21-06-2017 in CWJC No.

                                              12160/16    by Hon'ble Justice Ahsanuddin

                                              Amanullah (as His Lordship then was) which

                                              was also disposed of with along with CWJC
         Patna High Court MJC No.1153 of 2018(3) dt.12-03-2026
                                                     2/2




                                           No. 19127/16 Karuna Kumari Vs. State of

                                           Bihar & Ors.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   matter has become infructuous and as such he may be permitted

                   to withdraw the petition.

                                4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as

                   withdrawn



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.