Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of, as no sufficient ground for contempt was found.

Summary

Kiran Devi, widow of late Dineshwar Prasad, filed a contempt petition before the Patna High Court seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against several officials of the State of Bihar. She alleged that the respondents willfully disobeyed the order dated 03‑04‑2018 issued in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11684 of 2017. The petition relied on a show‑cause notice and a memorandum dated 15‑04‑2019 indicating that a reasoned order had been passed. The Court examined whether the alleged non‑compliance justified contempt proceedings. Justice Rajiv Roy observed that the petitioner was free to raise any remaining grievance but found no basis to proceed with contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of without any order of contempt.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents' alleged non‑compliance with the order dated 03‑04‑2018 amounts to contempt of court

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil writ
  • order compliance
  • high court
  • petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1184 of 2019
                                                      In
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11684 of 2017
                 ======================================================
                 Kiran Devi Wife of Late Dineshwar Prasad Resident of Village-Muradpur,
                 Chakmusa, P.S. Phulwari Sarif, Dist.-Patna


                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary,
                 Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
           2.    Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma Director, Education Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna
           3.    Mr. Kumar Ravi District Magistrate, Patna
           4.    Mr. Keshav Prasad District Programme Officer, Establishment, Patna
           5.    Mr. Shamsher Mallik Block Development Officer-cum-Member Secretary,
                 Block Employment Unit, Phulwari Sarif, Patna
           6.    Mr. Akhilesh Prasad Singh Block Education Officer, Phulwari Sarif, Patna


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA-12
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   06-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                    against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

                                    willful disobedience of the order dated 03.04.2018

                                    passed in CWJC No. 11684 of 2017.”

                                 3. A show cause is on record and learned State
            Patna High Court MJC No.1184 of 2019(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      counsel has taken this Court to memo no.583 dated 15.04.2019

                      to show that a reasoned order has been passed.

                                   4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the

                      matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt

                      petition stands disposed of.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.