Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed as the earlier order has been complied with.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of five individuals, filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the State of Bihar and several education officials for alleged willful disobedience of a prior order dated in CWJC No. The petition alleged that the opposite parties had not complied with that order. The court heard the matter on 7 May 2026 and noted that counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ court’s order had, in fact, been complied with. The court granted the petitioners liberty to raise any further grievance if it arose, but found no basis to proceed with contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents have willfully disobeyed the earlier writ court order.
  • Whether a contempt proceeding can be initiated against the respondents.
  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to any further relief in view of alleged compliance.

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • writ jurisdiction
  • compliance
  • civil writ
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1269 of 2020
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23304 of 2019
                 ======================================================
           1.     Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Ram Babu Ram R/o Village- Kalandra, P.O.- Injore,
                  P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal.
           2.    Ajay Kumar S/o Shri Ramtapeshwar Singh R/o Village- Ataulah, P.O.-
                 Pariyari, P.S.- Khirimore, District- Patna.
           3.    Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Suresh Singh R/o Vill. and P.O.- Minjahara, Via-
                 Goh, District- Aurangabad.
           4.    Bijay Ram S/o Nathun Ram, R/o Vill.- Alhanpure Chauki, (Narayan Bigha),
                 P.O.- Shakry Khurd, P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal.
           5.    Birendra Ram S/o Shri Butan Ram R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.O.-
                 Masadpur, P.S.- Palasi, District- Arwal.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar.
           2.    Shri Sanjay Kumar The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Dr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, IAS, The Director, Primary Education Department,
                 Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    Rina Kumari, The District Education Officer, Arwal.
           5.    Shri Parsuram Singh, The District Programme Officer (Establishment),
                 Arwal.
           6.    Anil Kumar Yadav, The Block Education Officer, Sonbhadra Banshi,
                 Suryapur, Arwal, District- Arwal.
           7.    Krishna Yadav, The Panchayat Secretary-cum- Niyojan Unit Sonbhadra,
                 Gram Panchayat, Banshi Suryapur Prakhand, District- Arwal.
           8.    Devyanti Devi, The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Sonbhadra Panchayat,
                 Banshi Suryapur Prakhand, District- Arwal.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Rama Kant Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr.( Ag )
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-05-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the
         Patna High Court MJC No.1269 of 2020(3) dt.07-05-2026
                                                     2/2




                   following relief(s)

                                          "for     initiation    of   contempt   proceeding

                                          against the contemnors/opposite parties for

                                          their willful disobedience of the order dated

                                          passed in CWJC No."

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   writ court’s order stands complied.

                                4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the

                   matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt

                   petition stands disposed of.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.