Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shashi Kant Rai,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court disposed of the petition without ordering contempt, noting that the required payments had been made albeit belatedly.

Summary

The petitioner, Shashi Kant Rai, filed a writ petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against several officials of the Bihar Water Resources Department, alleging that they deliberately violated an order dated 25 November 2019 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21058 of 2019. The petition claimed that the respondents had failed to comply with the earlier order, prompting a request for contempt action. The court observed that the respondents had eventually made the required payments to the petitioner, albeit with delay. Considering that the payment had been effected, the court granted the petitioner liberty to raise the matter further if desired, but did not order contempt proceedings. Consequently, the petition (MJC No. 145 of 2020) was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents' delayed payment constitutes willful violation of the order dated 25‑11‑2019 warranting contempt proceedings
  • Whether the court should initiate contempt action against the State officials

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil writ
  • order compliance
  • payment
  • Water Resources Department
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.145 of 2020
                                                      In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21058 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Shashi Kant Rai, son of late Shiv Prasad Rai @ Swami Nath Rai, resident of
                 village- Amarupur, P.S. Bhanwarkol, District- Gazipur (U.P.), presently
                 residing near Sone Canal Sub-Division at Koath, district- Rohtas.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Sri Sanjeev Hans, name of father not known to
                 the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai
                 Bhawan, Patna.
           2.    Sri Ram Pukar Singh, father not known to the petitioner, the Engineer-in-
                 Chief, Irrigation Creation (Former South), Water Resources Department,
                 Patna.
           3.    Md. Shamim Akhatar Mallik, father not known to the petitioner, the Chief
                 Engineer, Irrigation Creation, Water Resources Department, Dehri, District-
                 Rohtas.
           4.    Sri Suresh Singh, father not known to the petitioner, the Superintending
                 Engineer, Sone Canal Circle, Ara.
           5.    Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, son of Sri Kuldip Prasad, the Executive Engineer,
                 Sone Canal Division, Bikramganj (Rohtas).
           6.    Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, father not known to the petitioner, the Executive
                 Engineer, Left Bank Embankment Division, Bhitari- Bandh, Durgawati,
                 Camp at Chenari (Rohtas).
           7.    Sri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, father not known to the petitioner, the Executive
                 Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Buxar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :       Mr. Vinay Kriti Singh, GA-2
                                        :       Mr. Rajan Prakash, AC to GA-2
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                                “for initiation of contempt proceeding
            Patna High Court MJC No.145 of 2020(3) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                         against the opposite parties for deliberately and

                                         willfully violated the order dated 25.11.2019

                                         passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No.

                                         21058 of 2019.”

                                   3. From the reply to the show cause, it is clear that the

                      payments have been made to the petitioner though belatedly.

                                   4. Granting liberty to agitate the matter if the

                      petitioner so want, the MJC No. 145 of 2020 is disposed of.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.