Patna High Court
Babita KumariversusThe State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The MJC application is dismissed due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Babita Kumari, filed a Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Department of Social Welfare. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, and the petitioner herself expressed no interest in pursuing the application. The State was represented by counsel Dr. Md. Raisul Haque. The Court examined whether the application could be proceeded with in the absence of a petitioner’s representation and interest. Finding that the petitioner was not interested and no one appeared to prosecute the case, the Court dismissed the MJC application for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the MJC application should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s lack of interest and absence of counsel.
Subjects
- MJC
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.152 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1495 of 2022
======================================================
Babita Kumari Wife of Sri Harishankar Vidyarthy and Daughter of Sri Suresh
Sao, Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.O.- Pitwans, P.S.- Naubatpur, District-
Patna- 80442.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Social
Welfare Bihar, Patna.
2. The Directorate, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Department of Social Welfare, Bihar,
Patna.
3. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Patna.
5. The District Programme Officer, Patna.
6. The Child Development Project Officer, Naubatpru, Patna.
7. The Lady Supervisor, Child Development Project Office, Naubatipur, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
3 25-02-2026 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the
petitioner. However, Learned counsel for State is present.
2. It transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not
interested to pursue this application and therefore, this Court has
no option left, but to dismiss the present MJC application.
3. In this view of the matter, the present MJC
application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-
U
Checking your session…