Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Meena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary

Meena Devi filed a criminal writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several police officials. The petitioner argued that the relief sought was no longer viable during the pendency of the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found that the circumstances indeed rendered the petition ineffective. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • infructuous petition
  • petition dismissed
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1714 of 2023
                                                        In
                               Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1372 of 2022
                 ======================================================
                 Meena Devi W/O Bishwanath Ram, Resident of Village- Fatehpur Ward No.
                 13, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Sri Chaitanya Prasad, Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Rajvinder Singh Bhatti, the Director General of Police Bihar, Patna.
           4.    D.Amarkesh, the Suprintendent of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah.
           5.    Mahtab Alam, the Sub-divisional Police Officer, Bettiah.
           6.    Monaj Ram, the S.H.O. Yogapatti Police Station, District - West Champaran.
           7.    Rakesh Ram Son of Logan Ram, Resident of village - Chaumukha
                 Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Betiah.
           8.    Logan Ram Son of Late Dhodha Ram, Resident of village - Chaumukha
                 Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Betiah.
           9.    Pravhawati Devi Wife of Logan Ram, Resident of village - Chaumukha
                 Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Betiah.
           10. Prakash Ram Son of Logan Ram, Resident of village - Chaumukha
               Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Betiah.
           11. Umesh Ram Son of Logan Ram, Resident of village - Chaumukha
               Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran at Betiah.
           12. Vijay Yadav Son of Chandra Kishore Yadav, Resident of village -
               Chaumukha Badharwa, Police Station- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran
               at Betiah.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Manish Kumar (GP- 4)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
         Patna High Court MJC No.1714 of 2023(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                                     2/2




                   during the pendency of the present MJC, it has become

                   infructuous.

                                3. Accordingly, the present MJC stands dismissed as

                   having become infructuous.



                                                                 (Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.