Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Maharaj Mrigendra Pratap SahiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of as the respondents had complied with the earlier order.

Summary

Maharaj Mrigendra Pratap Sahi filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking contempt proceedings against the State of Bihar and two officials, alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 14‑11‑2014 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16239 of 2014. The petition prayed that the court initiate contempt action for the alleged non‑compliance. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the respondents had complied with the earlier order. The court accepted this information and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn, without any substantive finding on contempt.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the order dated 14.11.2014
  • Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated against the State and officials
  • Whether the petition can be withdrawn after compliance with the earlier order

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • petition withdrawal
  • compliance with court order
  • criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1948 of 2023
                                                    In
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16239 of 2014
                 ======================================================
                 Maharaj Mrigendra Pratap Sahi S/o Late Maharaj Gopeshwar Prasad Sahi R/o
                 Village Post and P.S. Hathwa, District-Gopalganj. Presently Residing At
                 Hathwa House, South Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800001.


                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Dr. Rakesh Kumar, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hathwa, Gopalganj, Bihar.
           3.    Swaminath Prasad, Circle Officer, Hathwa, Gopalganj, Patna.


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State            :       Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-03-2026                      Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                              “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                        against the opposite parties for their willful and

                                        deliberate disobedience of the order dated

                                        14.11.2014 passed by the Hon’ble Court in Cr.

                                        Misc. No. 16239 of 2014.”


                                 3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the

                   petitioner that the order stands complied and as such, he may be
            Patna High Court MJC No.1948 of 2023(3) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      permitted to withdraw the petition.

                                   4. Accordingly, MJC No. 1948 of 2023 is disposed of

                      as withdrawn.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.