Patna High Court
BiharversusRabindra Narayan Singh
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court dismissed the MJC application due to non‑prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear and showed no interest in pursuing the case.
Summary
The petitioners filed a Miscellaneous Jurisdiction (MJC) application before the Patna High Court but failed to appear despite repeated notices. The court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing the application. Consequently, the court found it had no alternative but to dismiss the application. The dismissal was based solely on the petitioners' non‑prosecution of the matter. No substantive merits of the petition were considered as the case was terminated procedurally.
Issues considered
- Can the High Court dismiss a petition for non‑prosecution when the petitioners do not appear or express interest in pursuing the application?
Subjects
- Civil writ jurisdiction
- Non‑prosecution
- Dismissal
- Procedural default
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2054 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4108 of 2020
======================================================
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
4. The Under Secretary to the Government, General Administration
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa.
6. The Secretary to the Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Rabindra Narayan Singh Son of Hardeo Singh Resident of Village-Pathar,
Police Station-Charpokhari, District-Bhojpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
3 25-02-2026 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of
the petitioners.
2. It transpires to this Court that the petitioners are not
interested to pursue this application and therefore, this Court has
no option left, but to dismiss the present MJC application.
3. In this view of the matter, the present MJC
application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-
U
Checking your session…