Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Bishnudeo MahtoversusThe State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary,

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The High Court restored the dismissed Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3217 of 2024 to its original file.

Summary

Petitioners Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav and Doman Yadav filed a petition seeking restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3217 of 2024, which had been dismissed for failure to comply with an order dated 06‑09‑2024. The High Court examined whether the dismissal for non‑compliance warranted setting aside and considered the propriety of reinstating the writ petition. Relying on its earlier reasoning (paragraphs 3‑6 of the order), the Court concluded that the dismissal was not justified and that the writ case should be revived. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2157 of 2025 was allowed, and the dismissed civil writ case was restored to its original file. The order effectively reinstates the petitioners’ original relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ case dismissed for non‑compliance with a prior order can be restored
  • Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the case

Subjects

  • civil writ
  • restoration
  • non‑compliance
  • high court
  • miscellaneous jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2157 of 2025
                                                       In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3217 of 2024
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bishunudeo Prasad Yadav @ Bishundeo Yadav @ Bishnudeo Mahto Son of
                  Late Shree Lal Mahto, Resident of Village- Siraiya P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal,
                  District - Begusarai.
           2.    Doman Yadav @ Doman Mahto Son of Late Shree Lal Mahto, Resident of
                 Village -Siraiya P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, District-Begusarai.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Chairman Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Board Vidyapati Marg,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Vidyapati Marg, Patna through its
                 Superintendent.
           4.    The Administrator-cum-Special Officer Bihar State Board of Religious Trust
                 Vidyapati Marg, Patna.
           5.    The Superintendent Bihar State Board of Religious Trust Vidyapati Marg,
                 Patna.
           6.    The Collector, Begusarai.
           7.    The Sub-Divisional Magistrate Balia, Begusarai.
           8.    The Circle Officer Sahebpur Kamal Block, Police Station Sahebpur Kamal,
                 District-Begusarai.
           9.    Harbansh Mahto Resident of Village-Siraiya, P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, District
                 Begusarai.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-04
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   06-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The present petition has been preferred for

                   restoration of CWJC No.3217 of 2024               which was dismissed

                   for non-compliance of the order dated 06.09.2024.
         Patna High Court MJC No.2157 of 2025(4) dt.06-02-2026
                                                     2/2




                                3. For the reasons assigned in paragraphs 3 to 6, the

                   MJC No. 2157 of 2025 is allowed.

                                4. The CWJC No.3217 of 2024 is restored to its

                   original file.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.