Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Siya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Siya Devi filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court seeking to compel the District Magistrate of Gaya to comply with an earlier order dated 21 January 2020 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1286 of 2020. The petition alleged that despite representations, the District Magistrate had not taken any action. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court entertained the request and disposed of the contempt petition as withdrawn. No further orders were made against the respondents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition seeking to enforce compliance with the earlier order should proceed
  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the contempt petition

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of petition
  • compliance with court order
  • administrative officials

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2317 of 2021
                                                      In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1286 of 2020
                 ======================================================
                 Siya Devi Wife of Late Jawahar Mahto Resident of Village-Tarwa Tola Jafra,
                 P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar Chief Secretary, Government
                 of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Sri Asangwa Chuba Aao, The Commissioner Magadh Division, Gaya,
           3.    Sri Abhishek Singh, The District Magistrate, Gaya.
           4.    Sri Nitish Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya.
           5.    Sri Rajiv Mishra, The Superintendent of Police, Gaya.
           6.    Sri Shrawan Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Muffasil Manpur,
                 Gaya.
           7.    Sri Purushottam Kumar, The Circle Officer, Wazirganj, Gaya.
           8.    Sri Abd Gaffar Khan The Incharge of Wazirganj, P.S.-Wazirganj, Gaya.
           9.    Lalo Yadav Sopn of Haldhar Yadav. Resident of Village-Tarwa Tola, Jafra,
                 P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.
           10. Mohan Yadav Son of Haldhar Yadav Resident of Village-Tarwa Tola, Jafra,
               P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.
           11. Vijay Yadav Son of Haldhar Yadav Resident of Village-Tarwa Tola, Jafra,
               P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag -12)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                              (i) for initiation of Contempt proceeding

                                              against the members of Opposite parties
         Patna High Court MJC No.2317 of 2021(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                                     2/2




                                           especially opposite party 3. The District

                                           Magistrate Gaya to comply the order dated

                                           21.01.2020            passed   in   C.W.J.C.   No.

                                           1286/2020 whereby and whereunder Hon'ble

                                           Court was pleased to direct the O.P. no. 3 to

                                           take appropriate action in accordance with

                                           law however despite representation filed by

                                           petitioner, no action has been taken till date.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

                   may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

                                4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of

                   as withdrawn.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.