Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Noshin Bano,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous and disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Noshin Bano, filed a writ petition seeking the initiation of contempt proceedings against several officials of the State of Bihar for allegedly violating a prior court order dated 01‑02‑2018 in CWJC No.9853 of 2007. The petition alleged deliberate and willful non‑compliance by the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner informed the court that the relief sought had become infructuous. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the petition could no longer be entertained as the relief sought was no longer viable. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petition for contempt becomes infructuous during its pendency?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • infructuous petition
  • high court
  • education department
  • state government

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.243 of 2020
                                                        In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9853 of 2007
                 ======================================================
                 Noshin Bano, Wife of Sri Haris Usmani, Resident of M.I.G. 28 Happy Villa
                 Kankarbagh Colony, Post Office- Kankarbagh, Police Station- Kankarbagh,
                 District- Patna. At present posted as Assistant Teacher at Mahesh High
                 School, Saristabad, Patna, Police Station- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Shri Deepak Prasad, the Chief Secretary,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    R.K. Mahajan, the Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources
                 Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Shri Girishwar Dayal Singh, the Director, Secondary Education, Human
                 Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    Shri Surendra Kumar Sinha, Regional Deputy Director, Secondary
                 Education, Patna Division, District- Patna.
           5.    Shri Jyoti Kumar, District Education Officer, Patna, District- Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Nagdeo Choubey, Advocate
                                          :         Mr. Pankaj Maijorwar, Advocate
                                          :         Mr. Abdul Wadood, Advocate
                 For the State            :         Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   10-03-2026                      Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                                    “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                        against the opposite parties for deliberately and

                                        willfully violating the order dated 01.02.2018

                                        passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 9853

                                        of 2007.”
            Patna High Court MJC No.243 of 2020(4) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the

                      petitioner that during the pendency of the petition it has become

                      infructuous.

                                   4. Accordingly, MJC No. 243 of 2020 is disposed of

                      as become infructuous.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.