Patna High Court
Manika KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Holding
The writ petition dismissed for non‑prosecution is restored to its original file.
Summary
The petitioner, Manika Kumari, filed a petition seeking restoration of a writ petition (C.W.J.C. No.15435 of 2021) that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 10‑01‑2024. The petitioner’s counsel explained that personal difficulty prevented his appearance at the hearing, leading to the dismissal. The court considered the circumstances and the petitioner’s request for a sympathetic view. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah held that, given the facts, the writ petition should be reinstated to its original file. Consequently, the petition for restoration was allowed.
Issues considered
- Can a writ petition dismissed for non‑prosecution be restored on the ground of personal difficulty of the petitioner’s counsel?
Subjects
- restoration of writ
- non‑prosecution
- civil writ jurisdiction
- procedural law
- court fees
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15435 of 2021
======================================================
Manika Kumari wife of Sri Ravindra Sah, Resident of village- Jonki, Gram
Panchayat-Chhatauni, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare
Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Child Development (Social Welfare) Department Bihar Patna.
3. The District Magistrate Madhubani.
4. The Distict Programme Officer Madhubani.
5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Jaynagar Madhubnani.
6. The Child Development Officer, Basopatti, Madhubani.
7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Chhatauni, Basopatti Madhubani.
8. Smt. Manju Kumari W/o- Virendra Sah Resident of Village - Jonki,
Chhatuani Ward No. 1, P.S. - Basopatti, District- Madhubani
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prashant Pratap, GP-2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
ORAL ORDER
3 16-01-2026 At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
undertakes to deposit the deficient court fees amounting to a
sum of Rs. 10/- by 19.01.2026. Permission, so sought, is
granted.
2. The present petition has been filed for restoration of a
writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 15435 of 2021, which has
stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated
10.01.2024.
Patna High Court MJC No.2484 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
2/2
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
due to personal difficulty, he could not appear when the case
was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was
dismissed for non-prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken
and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner as also taking into account the averments made in the
present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for
restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.
15435 of 2021 to its original file.
5. The present petition stands allowed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/-
U
Checking your session…