Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary/ the Additional Chief Secretary

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The contempt proceeding is dropped as the order dated 20‑09‑2024 has been complied with.

Summary

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, filed a miscellaneous jurisdiction petition seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several officials. Both parties jointly submitted that the order dated 20 September 2024 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14343 had been fully complied with. The court examined whether the pending contempt proceedings should continue in view of this compliance. Finding that the conditions of the earlier order were satisfied, the court held that there was no basis to continue the contempt action. Consequently, the contempt proceeding was dropped and the petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt proceedings should be continued when the order in C.W.J.C. No.14343 of 2024 has been complied with

Subjects

  • contempt
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • compliance
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.252 of 2025
                                                       In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14343 of 2024
                 ======================================================
                 Ranjit Kumar S/o Late Chandrama Lal, R/o Village and Post- Gahrun, P.S.-
                 Tarari, District- Bhojpur Ara.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary/ the Additional Chief
                 Secretary Sri Santosh Kumar Mall, Water Resource Department, Govt. of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary/ the Additional Chief Secretary, Sri Santosh Kumar
                 Mall, Water Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Principal Secretary, Sri Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Finance Department,
                 Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Engineer-in-Chief-cum Special Secretary, Sri Nand Kumar Jha, Water
                 Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Chief Engineer, Mr. Sharad Kumar, Irrigation Creation (Sinchai Srijan)
                 Water Resouce Department, Motihari.
           6.    The Superintending Engineer, Mr. Promod Kumar, Tirhut Canal Circle,
                 Muzaffarpur.
           7.    The Executive Engineer, Mr. Rakesh Bharti, Tirhut Canal Division, Ratwara,
                 Muzaffarpur.
           8.    The Accountant General, Mr. Vishal Bansal, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Siyaram Pandey, Advocate
                 For the State           :      Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad (AC to SC-13)
                 For the AG              :      Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   18-03-2026                   Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for

                   the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar,

                   Patna are present.

                                 2. It has been jointly submitted by both the parties that

                   the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14343 of
             Patna High Court MJC No.252 of 2025(6) dt.18-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                       2024 has been duly complied with.

                                    3. As such, the contempt proceeding is hereby

                       dropped and the present M.J.C. petition stands dismissed.



                                                                    (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.