Patna High Court
Mithilesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Mithilesh Paswan filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the grievances had been resolved and sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the contempt allegations were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after the grievances are redressed
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of petition
- civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2522 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4940 of 2019
======================================================
Mithilesh Paswan S/o Late Baso Paswan Resident of Village- More
Pashchimi, Ward No.9, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri. R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary,
Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Chitranjan Singh The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Sri Kumar Ravi, The District Magistrate, Patna.
4. Sri Ramjaipal Ram, The Deputy Director, Establishment, Patna.
5. Sri Keshav Prasad, The District Programme Officer, Patna.
6. Sri Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, The Block Development Officer, Athmalgola,
District- Patna
7. Mrs. Madhuri Dwivedi, The Block Educational Extension Officer,
Athmalgola, District- Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA-12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
6 08-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the grievances of the petitioner have been
redressed, therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the present
contempt petition.
3. The permission, so sought for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.