Patna High Court
Satish Prasad SahversusThe State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary,
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Holding
The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Satish Prasad Sah filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and several government officials seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing date of 29-06-2026. The court observed that the petitioner had also failed to appear on the previous date of 25-06-2026. In view of the petitioner’s non‑appearance, the court held that the application could not proceed. Accordingly, the application was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The court further directed that any pending applications, if any, be disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ application should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear before the court
Subjects
- writ jurisdiction
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2671 of 2022
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7248 of 2022
======================================================
Satish Prasad Sah Son of Dev Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Sonmai, P.O.-
Sonmai, P.S.-Dhanarua, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. District Magistrate, Patna.
3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Masaurhi, District- Patna.
4. District Supply Officer, Patna, District-Patna.
5. Assistant District Supply Officer, Masaurhi, District- Patna.
6. Block Supply Officer, Block- Dhanarua, District- Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5
Mr. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
5 29-06-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Upon perusal of record, it appears that on the last date
also i.e., 25.06.2026, none had appeared on behalf of the
petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed
for non-prosecution.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
( Ranjan Kumar Jha, J)
rishabh/rajesh
U
Checking your session…