Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

The Bihar Industrial Area Development AuthorityversusM/s Yasraj Cycle Rickshaw Udyog,

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The application for modification was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIDA) filed an application on 17-04-2026 seeking modification of an earlier order dated 1 November 2022 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12237 of 2019, which involved a dispute with M/s Yasraj Cycle Rickshaw Udyog and the State of Bihar. The petitioners were represented by three advocates, while the State was represented by a single counsel. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application for modification was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court should permit the withdrawal of the application for modification of the earlier order

Subjects

  • modification of order
  • withdrawal of application
  • Civil Writ Jurisdiction
  • High Court
  • Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.269 of 2023
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12237 of 2019
                 ======================================================
           1.     The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority through its Managing
                  Director, Udyog Bhawan, Patna.
           2.    The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority,
                 Udyog Bhawan, Patna.
           3.    The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Development Authority, Udyog
                 Bhawan, Patna.
           4.    The Assistant Development Officer, Bihar Industrial Development
                 Authority, Regional Office, Darbhanga.
           5.    The Regional Incharge, BIDA, Regional Office, Dinar, Darbhanga.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    M/s Yasraj Cycle Rickshaw Udyog, Industrial Area, Donar Darbhanga,
                 through its Proprietor Smt. Neetu Gupta, Wife of Subhash Gupta, Resident
                 of Mohalla-Alallpatti, P.S. Bela, District-Darbhanga.
           2.    The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Industries Department,
                 Patna.
           3.    Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Bihar, Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate
                                               Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Advocate
                                               Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Mr. Abbas Haider, SC- 6
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY)

3   17-04-2026                   The instant application has been filed praying for

                   modification of the order dated 1.11.2022 passed in C.W.J.C.

                   no. 12237 of 2019 (M/s Yasraj Cycle Rickshaw Udyog vs. The

                   State of Bihar and Ors.).
           Patna High Court MJC No.269 of 2023(3) dt.17-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                     to withdraw this application.

                                  3. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as

                     withdrawn.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)


                                                  (Khatim Reza, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.