Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Afshan AzeemversusThe State of Bihar through Mr. Brajesh Malhotra, the Chief Secretary,

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2753 of 2024
                                                        In
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4351 of 2024
                   ======================================================
                   Afshan Azeem, Gender-Female, Wife of Shri Satish Kumar Singh, Resident
                   of 301, Saket Tower, S.P. Verma Road, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

              1.   The State of Bihar through Mr. Brajesh Malhotra, the Chief Secretary,
                   Government of Bihar, Patna.
              2.   Dr. Pratima, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary,         Commercial      Taxes
                   Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
              3.   Mr. Sanjay Prasad, the Additional Commissioner (upgrded post of the Joint
                   Commissioner), Commercial Taxes Department, Bihar, Patna.
              4.   Shiv Nandan Chaudhary, the Deputy Secretary, Commercial Taxes
                   Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :   Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :   Additional Advocate General 13
                   ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                         ORAL ORDER

2    03-04-2026                   The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to

                     withdraw the present petition, to which the learned counsel

                     appearing for the State has got no objection.

                                  2. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands

                     dismissed as not pressed.


                                                 (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

GAURAV S./-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.