Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sharda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Since the order dated 18‑09‑2025 has been complied with, the contempt proceedings are dropped.

Summary

Sharda Devi filed a petition challenging the State of Bihar and the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate. The State argued that the order dated 18‑09‑2025 in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 331 of 2025 had been complied with by the SDM and that a copy was served to the petitioner's counsel. The court examined whether the compliance was genuine and whether any contempt of court proceedings should continue. Finding that the order had indeed been complied with, the court held that there was no ground to continue the contempt action. Consequently, the contempt proceedings were dropped.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dated 18‑09‑2025 in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 331 of 2025 has been complied with by the SDM
  • Whether the contempt proceedings should be continued in view of the alleged compliance

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • criminal writ jurisdiction
  • order compliance
  • high court
  • petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.291 of 2026
                                                 In
                           Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.331 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Sharda Devi Wife of Kanhaiya Prasad Gupta @ Khinya Pd. Gupta, Resident
                 of Village- Bhuawal P.S.- Chilhar, P.S.-Dinara, District- Rohtas, Presently
                 Residing at Bairiya near Patliputra Bus, Terminal P.S.-Sampatchak, District-
                 Patna.


                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus


           1.    The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Patna.
           2.    Sri Satyam Sahay, The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Patna City, Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Ajay Kumar Prasar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. GA-5
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   01-05-2026                   Supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of

                   opposite party no. 2 which is kept on record.

                                 02. Learned counsel         appearing on behalf            of

                   State/opposite parties submits that the order dated 18.09.2025

                   passed in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 331 of 2025 has

                   been complied by the learned SDM, Patna City and a copy has

                   been served to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner.
            Patna High Court MJC No.291 of 2026(5) dt.01-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   03. Since the order dated 18.09.2025 stands complied,

                      the contempt proceeding is dropped.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.