Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Birendra Singh,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. (PRE-EMPTORY)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the earlier court order.

Summary

Petitioner Birendra Singh filed a writ petition challenging actions of various officials of the State of Bihar. The High Court had earlier issued an order on 12-12-2025 requiring compliance by the respondents. The petitioners failed to demonstrate that the respondents complied with that order. On 27-01-2026, Justice Alok Kumar Sinha dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑compliance with the previous order. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners complied with the High Court's order dated 12-12-2025
  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑compliance with the previous order

Subjects

  • non‑compliance
  • dismissal
  • writ jurisdiction
  • high court
  • order enforcement

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3156 of 2019
                                                       In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22241 of 2018
                  ======================================================
                  Birendra Singh, Son of Late Janardan Singh, Resident of Village- Ghoshi
                  (Tola Fatehpur), Post- Amain, Police Station- Parasbigha, Block and District-
                  Jehanabad.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar through S.Sidharth, the Principal Secretary, Department
                  of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    Ravi Shankar Choudhary, the District Magistrate Arwal.
            3.    Vidhan Chand Yadav, the District Panchayat Officer, Arwal.
            4.    Rajiv Ranjan Prasad, the District Accounts Officer, Arwal.
            5.    Manoj Kumar Srivastav, the Block Development Officer Kaler, District-
                  Arwal.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy
                  For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, A.C. to G.A-5.
                  ====================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    27-01-2026                     For non-compliance of previous order dated

                    12.12.2025, the case is dismissed.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the State is present.



                                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.