Patna High Court
Bindeshwari MandalversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The contempt petition is disposed of, effectively dismissing the application for contempt proceedings.
Summary
The petitioner, Bindeshwari Mandal, filed a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the District Magistrate of Saharsa and the Block Development Officer, alleging willful violation of an order passed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13775 of 2010. The respondents filed a show‑cause response stating that the required payments had been made. The court examined whether the respondents’ actions constituted contempt of the earlier order. Finding that the matter could be agitated by the petitioner if any grievance remained, the court disposed of the contempt petition without further order. Consequently, no contempt proceedings were instituted.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondents willfully violated the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13775 of 2010, justifying contempt proceedings
- Whether the petition for contempt should be entertained or dismissed
Subjects
- contempt of court
- civil writ jurisdiction
- execution of court order
- high court procedure
- disposal of petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3308 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13775 of 2010
======================================================
Bindeshwari Mandal Son of Late Khusilal Mandal Resident of Village -
Ghibaha, Police Station - Chhatapur, District - Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Smt. Dr. Shelja Sharma, District Magistrate, Saharsa.
3. Mr. Amrendra Kumar Amar, Block Development Officer, Kahara, Saharsa.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raghwanand, G.A.11
Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwary, AC to GA-11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
4 12-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
following relief/s:
(i) for initiation of contempt proceeding
against the respondent party no. 2 and 3 for
their willful and deliberate violation of order
passed by in C.W.J.C. No. 13775 of 2010
and or punishing than appropriately in
accordance with law..
3. A show cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2
and 3 is on record, according to which, payments have been
made to him.
Patna High Court MJC No.3308 of 2018(4) dt.12-03-2026
2/2
4. In that background, allowing the petitioner to
agitate the matter, if he has still any grievance, the contempt
petition is disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.