Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Punam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Punam Kumari & Ors. filed a civil writ application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the Court’s earlier order was fully complied with. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, sought permission to withdraw the pending application on the ground of compliance. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The State’s counsel was present throughout the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending application after full compliance with the Court's earlier order

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court procedure
  • compliance with court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3313 of 2023
                                                    In
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9711 of 2022
                  ======================================================
                  Punam Kumari & Ors.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                  The State of Bihar & Ors.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy No. I, SC-13
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    16-01-2026                     At the outset Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned

                    Advocate for the petitioner submits at the Bar that during the

                    pendency of the present application, the order of this Court has

                    been fully complied with and, as such, he seeks permission to

                    withdraw the present application.

                                 2. In view thereof, the present application stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.

                                 3. Learned Advocate for the State is present.



                                               (Harish Kumar, J)
supratim/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.