Patna High Court
Surendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The contempt application is disposed of as the order of the Court has been complied with.
Summary
Surendra Kumar Yadav filed a contempt application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and other officials. The petitioner alleged that the respondents had not complied with a prior order of the Court. The respondents, through counsel, submitted that the order had already been complied with. The Court examined the submission and found no further ground to proceed with the contempt proceedings. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt application, effectively dismissing it.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt application should be dismissed on the ground that the order of this Court has been complied with
Subjects
- contempt
- civil writ jurisdiction
- order compliance
- high court
- application disposal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3342 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17177 of 2015
======================================================
Surendra Kumar Yadav Son of Late Jhaman Singh Yadav Resident of Village-
Hat Pokhar, P.S- Piro, District- Bhojput at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mrs. Sangeeta Singh, The Additional Secretary, Minor Water Resources
Department, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
3. Mr. Pushkar Kumar, the Accountant General, Virchand Patel Path, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to Ex-GA-9
For the Accountant General : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Advocate
: Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
10 01-05-2026 Heard Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for
the petitioner, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the
Respondents and Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned senior counsel
for the Accountant General.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present contempt application may be disposed of as the order of
this Court has already been complied with.
3. In view of the aforesaid, this contempt application
stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.