Patna High Court
Reeta VermaversusPatna Municipal Corporation Through Animesh Kumar Parashar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The application is infructuous and must be disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Reeta Verma, filed a representation before the Patna Municipal Corporation which was subsequently disposed of. She then approached the Patna High Court seeking relief, contending that the order of the Writ Court had been complied with. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that since the representation was disposed, the Writ Court's order stood complied with. The Court observed that the compliance of the Writ Court's order rendered the present application moot. Consequently, the Court held that the application was infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of an application when the relief sought has already been granted and the order of the Writ Court is complied with?
Subjects
- Writ jurisdiction
- Representation
- Infructuous application
- Municipal corporation
- Civil procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3422 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11609 of 2025
======================================================
Reeta Verma W/o Late Arun Kumar Verma R/o House C/17 Road No. 6C,
Rajendra Nagar, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Patna-800016
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Patna Municipal Corporation Through Animesh Kumar Parashar The
Municipal Commissioner, Patna, Bihar
2. Sri Animesh Kumar Parashar, The Municipal Commissioner, Patna
Municipal Commissioner, Patna, Bihar
3. Jaya Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, C Block, Maurya Lok,
Patna
4. Kamakhya Narayan Prasad Gupta, The Assistant Engineer, Vigilance
Section, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Patna
5. Ravi Ranjan, The Assistant Town Planning Supvervisor, Sahkari Yojna
Sakha, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Patna
6. Sri Gangakant Thakur, The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation,
Bankipore Circle, Patna
7. Sudhir Kumar, S/o not known to the Petitioner Resident of Plot no.-277,
House no. C/16, Road no. 6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Distt.-Patna-
800016
8. Subodh Kumar, S/o not known to the Petitioner, Resident of Plot no.-277,
House no. C/16, Road no. 6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Distt.-Patna-
800016
9. Mukesh Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner Resident of Plot no.-277,
House no. C/16, Road no. 6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Distt.-Patna-
800016
10. Lalan Kumar, S/o not known to the Petitioner Resident of Plot no.-277,
House no. C/16, Road no. 6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.-Kadamkuan, Distt.-Patna-
800016
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Divya Verma, Advocate
For the PMC : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 09-01-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned senior
counsel appearing on behalf of Patna Municipal Corporation are
Patna High Court MJC No.3422 of 2025(4) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
representation filed by the petitioner has been disposed of, and
therefore, the order passed by the Writ Court stands complied
with.
3. In view of the fact that the order of the Writ Court
stands complied with, the present application has become
infructuous and it is accordingly disposed of.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Checking your session…