Patna High Court
Sanjay Kumar Sukla @ Sanjay Kumar ShuklaversusThe State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Patna namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Sukla, filed a Miscellaneous Jurisdiction (MJC) petition seeking relief against the State of Bihar and senior police officials. During the pendency of this petition, the order dated 22‑12‑2023 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3411 of 2020 was complied with by the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner’s counsel applied to the court for permission to withdraw the pending MJC petition. The learned counsel for the opposite parties opposed the withdrawal. The Hon’ble Justice Dr. Anshuman considered whether the court could grant permission to withdraw a petition that had become moot. The court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the MJC petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw a pending petition after the relief sought has been obtained.
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- civil writ jurisdiction
- high court order
- dismissal
- petition withdrawn
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3640 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3411 of 2020
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Sukla @ Sanjay Kumar Shukla Son of Sri Late Rajnath Sukla,
Resident of Village-Lathiphapur, P.S.-Nangla Singi, District-Faizabad (Uttar
Pradesh).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Patna
namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena Patna.
2. The Director General (D.G.) of Police Bihar, Patna namely Sri Alok Raj.
3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (D.I.G.) Champaran Range, Bettiah,
namely Sri Jayant Kant.
4. The Superintendent of Police (S.P.) West Champaran namely Sri Saurya
Suman.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kant Panday, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Saroj Kr. Sharma, AC to AAG-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
5 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the Opposite Party/s.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,
during the pendency of the MJC petition, the order dated
22.12.2023, passed in CWJC No. 3411 of 2020 has been
complied with. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw the
present MJC petition.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present MJC petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.