Patna High Court
Purushottam KumarversusShri Yashpal Meena, I.A.S., Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Purushottam Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner later complied with the order of the Writ Court and sought to withdraw the petition, stating that further proceedings would serve no purpose. The learned counsel for the petitioner moved that the case be withdrawn. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the proceedings were terminated without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may dismiss a writ petition upon the petitioner's request for withdrawal
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3927 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7674 of 2025
======================================================
Purushottam Kumar son of Late Brij Kishore Prasad, resident of C/15A, S.K.
Puri, Near Buddha In, Police Station-S.K. Puri, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Shri Yashpal Meena, I.A.S., Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal
Corporation Maurya Lok, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Patna.
2. Shri Ashish Kumar, I.A.S., Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Patna
Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Patna.
3. Shri Arvind Kumar, City Manager, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya
Lok, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Adv
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Adv
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
order of the Writ Court has been complied with, and therefore,
no purpose would be served in pursuing with the present case.
He, therefore, prays for withdrawing the present case.
3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-
U
Checking your session…