Patna High Court
Arti Banerjee @ Aarti BanerjeeversusSri Yashpal Meena, Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Summary
Arti Banerjee filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against several officials of the Patna Municipal Corporation. The petition was related to an order of contempt that had been issued against the respondents. The petitioner later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the contempt order had been complied with. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the civil writ petition after compliance with the contempt order
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- contempt of court
- civil writ jurisdiction
- Patna High Court
- procedural law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4056 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4972 of 2025
======================================================
Arti Banerjee @ Aarti Banerjee Wife of Late Debangshu Banerjee, Resident
of Mohalla-South Shri Krishna Puri, P.S.-Shri Krishna Puri, Patna, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Sri Yashpal Meena, Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation
Patna.
2. Tahsin Khanam, Assistant Engineer, Nutan Rajdhani Anchal, Patna
Municipal Corporation, Mauryalok Complex, Patna.
3. Sri Pradhuman Singh Yadav, the Additional Town Commissioner, Patna
Municipal Corporation, at Mauryalok Complex, Patna.
4. Sri Birendra Kumar Tarun, The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal
Corporation, Patna, Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prasoon Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 10-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the opposite parties are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the present petition as the order under contempt has
been complied with.
3. Permission is granted.
4. As such, the present application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Checking your session…