Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of, and no contempt proceedings were initiated.

Summary

Petitioner Sanjeev Sharma filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the State of Bihar and several officials for allegedly failing to comply with an earlier order dated 23 May 2016 in CWJC No. 3437 of 2019. The petition alleged willful and deliberate non‑compliance by the opposite parties. During the hearing on 10 March 2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the order had in fact been complied with and that the petitioner wished to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and no contempt proceedings were ordered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the opposite parties were in contempt for not complying with the order dated 23 May 2016 in CWJC No. 3437 of 2019
  • Whether the petition seeking contempt proceedings should be entertained or dismissed

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of petition
  • compliance
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4100 of 2019
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3437 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjeev Sharma S/o Late Nand Bihari Sharma, R/o Near Pandey Jee (Petrol
                 Pump), N.H. 28, at and P.O.- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Mr. Chanchal Kumar, Principal Secretary,
                 Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Mr. Nawin Kumar, The Engineer in Chief, Building Construction
                 Department, Bihar. Patna.
           3.    Mr. Sri Niwas Singh, The Superintendent of Engineer, Building Circle,
                 Muzaffarpur.
           4.    Mr. Satendra Kumar Choudhary, The Executive Engineer, Building
                 Division, Muzaffarpur.
           5.    Mr. Nawal Singh, The Assistant Engineer, Building Division, Muzaffarpur.
           6.    Monika Kumari Junior Engineer, Building Division, Muzaffarpur.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State            :      Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, SC-26
                                          :      Mr. Divit Vinod, AC to SC-26
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                      Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                                  “for initiation of contempt proceedings

                                        against the contemnor-opposite parties for

                                        willfully and deliberately not complying with the

                                        order dated 23.05.2016 passed by the Hon’ble

                                        Court in CWJC No. 3437 of 2019.”
            Patna High Court MJC No.4100 of 2019(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the

                      petitioner that the order stands complied and as such, he may be

                      permitted to withdraw the petition.

                                   4. Accordingly, the MJC No. 4100 of 2019 is

                      disposed of as withdrawn.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.