Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishan Chandra MahtoversusMr. Nitin Jairam Gadkari, The Union of India

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that a petition may be withdrawn with its permission, and accordingly dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

Krishan Chandra Mahto filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of various government officials related to land acquisition. During the pendency of the writ, the petitioner’s grievances were reportedly resolved. The petitioner then applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether a petition can be withdrawn after the issues have been redressed. Finding no impediment, the Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a civil writ petition after the grievances have been redressed during pendency

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • land acquisition
  • court procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4162 of 2025
                                                        In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1728 of 2023
                 ======================================================
                 Krishan Chandra Mahto Son of Rajendra Mahto, Resident of Village- Potgah,
                 P.S. and P.O.- Harlakhi, Circle- Harlakhi, Distt. Madhubani.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    Mr. Nitin Jairam Gadkari, The Union of India through the Minister of Road
                 Transport, National High Way Government of India Transport Bhawan, New
                 Delhi.
           2.    Dr. Sandeep Kumar R Pudakalkatti, The State of Bihar through the Principal
                 Secretary, the Road Construction Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Mr. Vijay Kumar, The Chief Engineer National, High Way, Sub-Division
                 Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, The Under Secretary-cum Director Land
                 Acquisition Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    Mr. Kauhsal Kishor, The Divisional           Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator
                 Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.
           6.    Mr. Aand Sharma, The Collector, Distt. - Madhubani.
           7.    Mr. Avinash Kumar Singh, The Additional Collector, Land Reforms Officer,
                 Madhubani, Distt.- Madhubani.
           8.    Mr. Rakesh Kumar, The Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani, Distt. -
                 Madhubani.
           9.    Ms. Rita Kumari, The Circle Officer, Harlakhi, Distt.- Madhubani.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :   Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :   Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP-22
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-04-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

                   for the opposite parties are present.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                   to withdraw the present petition since the grievances of the

                   petitioner has been redressed during pendency of the writ
            Patna High Court MJC No.4162 of 2025(3) dt.10-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petition.

                                   3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. As such, the present application stands dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.