Patna High Court
Pradip Kumar @ PradipversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Pradip Kumar, filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several local officials. The petition alleged contempt of court by the respondents. During the hearing on 30‑01‑2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the contempt allegations were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may permit the petitioner to withdraw a contempt petition?
- What is the appropriate disposition of a contempt petition when withdrawn by the petitioner?
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of petition
- civil writ jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4228 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4588 of 2015
======================================================
Pradip Kumar @ Pradip Son of Late Ayodhya Halwai, resident of village-
Mahuatal, Barbigha, P.S.- Barbigha, district- Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Shekhar Anand, The District Magistrate cum
District collector, Sheikhpura, district- Sheikhpura.
2. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Executive officer, Nagar Panchayat (Nagar Parishad)
Barbigha, p.s.-Barbigha, district- Sheikhpura.
3. Mr. Sonu Kumar, Chairman, Nagar Panchayat (Nagar Parishad) Barbigha,
district- Sheikhpura.
4. Mrs. Nidhi Kumari, Voice Chairman, Nagar Panchayat (Nagar Parishad)
Barbigha, District-Sheikhpura.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Ram Murti, Adv.
Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha, AAG-7
For the O.P. Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 30-01-2026 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are
present.
2. At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
3. In view thereof, the present contempt petition
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/-
U
Checking your session…