Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amrita Enterprises through its proprietor Amrita KumariversusState of Bihar through the District Magistrate

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Since the order dated 20‑06‑2024 has been complied with, the petition stands closed.

Summary

Amrita Enterprises, through its proprietor Amrita Kumari, filed a petition challenging an order dated 20 June 2024 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14944 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the order had already been complied with, and therefore there was nothing further for the court to adjudicate. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated that compliance had been achieved. The court examined the claim of compliance and found no pending issues. Consequently, the court held that the matter stood closed and disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition remains maintainable after the order dated 20‑06‑2024 has been complied with

Subjects

  • compliance
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • petition closure
  • mootness
  • court order

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4524 of 2024
                                                         In
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14944 of 2023
                   ======================================================
                   Amrita Enterprises through its proprietor Amrita Kumari aged about 41 years
                   (F), W/o Shri Arbind Kumar, resident of Ward No. 05, Village and P.O. -
                   Bhelwa, Jogauliya Tola, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran at
                   Motihari.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
             1.     State of Bihar through the District Magistrate East Champaran at Motihari
                    namely Sri Saurabh Jorwal, S/o unknown to petitioner
             2.    Sri Saurabh Jorwal, S/o unknown to petitioner the District Magistrate, East
                   Champaran at Motihari.
             3.    Dr. Vinod Kumar Singh, S/o unknown to petitioner the Civil Surgeon-cum-
                   Chief Medical Officer, East Champaran at Motihari.
             4.     Dr. Sunil Kumar, S/o unknown to petitioner, I/C Medical Officer,
                    Primary/Community Health Centre, Harsidhi, East Champaran at Motihari.
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Rananjay Kumar, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Yashraj Bardhan, Adv.
                   For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. S. D. Yadav, Additional Advocate General 9
                                                 Mr. B. B. Mishra, AC to AAG 9
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                         ORAL ORDER

5     25-02-2026                   Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                     submits that the order dated 20.06.2024 passed in CWJC No. 14944

                     of 2023 has already been complied and, therefore, nothing remains to

                     be adjudicated.

                                   2. Having regard to the same, the present MJC stands

                     closed.



Bhardwaj/-                                               (A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.