Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

S. M. Shakeel ChistyversusThe State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Governm

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, S.M. Shakeel Chisty, filed a contempt petition seeking a rule of contempt against the State of Bihar and related officials for allegedly violating an order dated 16-03-2018. The petition was filed in the Patna High Court under Civil Writ Jurisdiction. During the hearing on 12-03-2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the matter had become infructuous and requested withdrawal of the petition. The court considered whether the petition could be dismissed on the basis of withdrawal. Finding no opposition and accepting the withdrawal request, the court dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the contempt allegation were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it?

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court order
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4653 of 2018
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1583 of 2018
                 ======================================================
                 S. M. Shakeel Chisty S/o S.M. Qaiyoum, R/o Azad Lane, Brahmpura, P.S.-
                 Brahmpura, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources
                 Development Department, Governm null null
           2.    The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna, namely Mr Rajiv Prasad
                 Singh 'Ranjan', I.A.S.
           3.    The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, namely Mr. Lalan Kumar
                 Singh.
           4.    The District Programme Officer Establishment, Muzaffarpur, namely Mr.
                 Binay Kumar.
           5.    The Managing Committee, Abeda High School 2, Muzaffarpur, through its
                 Secretary namely Dr Md Rais
           6.    The Head Master, Abeda High School 2, Muzaffarpur, namely Mr. Sajjad
                 Siddique.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Purushottam Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA-12
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   12-03-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                              (i) for issuance of Rule of Contempt against

                                              the opposite parties, for their willful and

                                              deliberate   violation     of    order      dated

                                              16.03.2018 passed in C.W.J.C.No 1583 of

                                              2018.
         Patna High Court MJC No.4653 of 2018(4) dt.12-03-2026
                                                     2/2




                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   matter has become infructuous and as such he may be permitted

                   to withdraw the petition.

                                4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as

                   withdrawn.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.