Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suresh Prasad @ Suresh Prasad No. 1,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition is disposed of as the petitioner’s grievances have been redressed.

Summary

The petitioner, Suresh Prasad, filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and certain district officials. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s grievances were reportedly redressed. The petitioner’s counsel moved that, in view of the redress, the petition should be disposed of. The court considered the submission and found no further relief to be granted. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any order on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner’s grievances have been redressed during the pendency of the case

Subjects

  • civil writ petition
  • redressal
  • disposal
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4842 of 2019
                                                         In
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19378 of 2010
                  ======================================================
                  Suresh Prasad @ Suresh Prasad No. 1, son of Late Nathun Prasad, resident of
                  village- Tikuliya Par, P.O. Nagma, P.S. Kalo, District- Jehanabad, the retired
                  Correspondence Clerk of the office of Executive Engineer, Road Construction
                  Department, Road Division, Buxar, District- Buxar.
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar, son of not known to the
                   petitioner, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    Sri Azmat Ali Ansari, son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as
                  the District Accounts Officer, Buxar, District- Buxar.
            3.     Sri Ashok Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as the
                   District Accounts Officer, Ara, District- Bhojpur at Ara.
                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Vikash Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                   Mrs.Anita Kumari, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav (AAG-11)
                                                   Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, AC to AAG-11
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    24-04-2026              The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that the grievances of the petitioner has stood

                    redressed during the interregnum period, hence the

                    present petition be disposed of.

                    2.       Accordingly,          the     present        petition       stands

                    disposed of.


                                               (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.