Ramadhar SaoversusThe State Bank Of India, through its Regional Manager and Ors

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.489 of 2019
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3594 of 2013
                 ======================================================
                 Ramadhar Sao Son of Shree Sao Resident of Village And P.O- Paharpur, P.S-
                 Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State Bank of India, through its Regional Manager and Ors namely
                 Bakht, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur.
           2.    Sri Kumar Vatsalya, Disciplinary Officer-cum- Assistant General Manager
                 (Administration), Administrative Officer, State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur.
           3.    Sri Nawal Kishore Mishra, Appellate Authority-cum- Deputy General
                 Manager (Commercial and Operation), Administrative Office, State Bank of
                 Inda, Muzaffarpur.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :   Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :   Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For SBI                  :   Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   09-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the opposite party and learned counsel for the

                   Respondent-SBI.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   he is under instruction to withhdraw the present MJC

                   application with liberty to file representation before the

                   Deputy General Manager (Commercial and Operation),

                   Administrative Office, State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur for

                   claiming certain dues which as per the petitioner is still due
Patna High Court MJC No.489 of 2019(4) dt.09-01-2026
                                            2/3




          to be paid.

                       3. Learned counsel for the Respondent-SBI is

          present.

                       4. In view of the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, MJC application is disposed of as

          withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a

          representation        before       the       Deputy   General   Manager

          (Commercial and Operation), Administrative Office, State

          Bank of India, Muzaffarpur for claiming dues, if any. The

          said representation must be filed within one month from the

          date of this order and upon receipt of the representation, the

          Deputy General Manager (Commercial and Operation),

          Administrative Office, State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur is

          further directed to dispose of the same within a further

          period of three months, after giving an opportunity of

          hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that in case the

          petitioner is found entilted to the relief which the petitioner

          would be claiming through the representation then the same

          should be extended to the petitioner within one month from

          the date of passing of the final order by the authority

          concerned.
          Patna High Court MJC No.489 of 2019(4) dt.09-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 5. With the aforesaid observations and direction,

                    the present writ application is disposed of. All pending

                    Interlocutory Applications, if any, will be deemed to have

                    been disposed of.



                                             (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U