Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. KhushhalversusDeepak Kumar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioners liberty to agitate the matter but declining to order contempt proceedings.

Summary

The petitioners, four residents of Katihar, filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against several officials of the Bihar government for alleged willful disobedience of an order dated 7 May 2018 passed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10717 of 2017. The petition relied on a show‑cause notice and a memo dated 1 July 2019 in which the respondents rejected the petitioners' claim. The High Court, after hearing the parties, granted the petitioners liberty to raise any further grievance but disposed of the contempt petition, effectively refusing to commence contempt proceedings. The court’s order indicates that the matter may be pursued through other appropriate channels, but no contempt finding was made. The petition was therefore dismissed without any order of contempt against the respondents.

Issues considered

  • Did the respondents willfully disobey the order dated 7 May 2018 issued in CWJC No. 10717 of 2017?
  • Can a contempt proceeding be initiated on the basis of the alleged disobedience?

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • state government officials
  • disobedience of court order
  • petition disposal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4918 of 2018
                                                       In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10817 of 2017
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Khushhal s/o Md. Abu Bakar Vill.- Falkubari, P.o.- Marghia, P.s.-
                  Barari, Distt.- Katihar
           2.    Abdul Kuddus S/o Md. Ishaque Vill.- Raj Tola, P.o.- Kabar, P.s.- Barari,
                 Distt.- Katihar
           3.    Abdul Bashir S/o Habibur Rahman Vill.- Sadartola, P.o.- Marghia, P.s.-
                 Barari, Distt.- Katihar
           4.    Mafuzzul Hussain S/o Md. Islam Vill.- Hashimpur, P.o.- Hashimpur, P.s.-
                 Barari, Distt.- Katihar

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    Deepak Kumar The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna
           2.    The State of Bihar through Sri R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary,
                 Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
           3.    Sri Kamal Kumar Sinha the Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar,
                 Patna
           4.    Arsad Firoj the Chairman of Bihar Madarsa Education Board, Patna
           5.    Md. Jahid Hussain the Secretary Bihar State Madarsa Education Board,
                 Patna
           6.    Dinesh Chandra Dev the District Education Officer, Katihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Md. Anjum Akhter, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA-12
                                        :      Ms. Abhanjali, AC to GA-12
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   06-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                    against the contemnors/opposite parties for their
            Patna High Court MJC No.4918 of 2018(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                      willful disobedience of the order dated 07.05.2018

                                      passed in CWJC No. 10717 of 2017.”

                                   3. A show cause of the opposite party contains

                      annexure-R2/A according to which vide memo no. 681 dated

                      01.07.2019, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

                                   4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the

                      matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt

                      petition stands disposed of.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.