Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vinodanand Jha @ Binoda Nand Jha,versusThe State of Bihar.

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Vinodanand Jha, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and certain officials. During the hearing on 13-01-2026, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner had instructed him to withdraw the writ application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ petition can be withdrawn after filing and what procedural effect follows

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4997 of 2019
                                                        In
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2070 of 2018
                  ======================================================
                  Vinodanand Jha @ Binoda Nand Jha, Son of Sri Narayan Jha, Resident of
                  Village- Silet Ward No. 10, P.O. and P.S. Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar.
            2.    Sri R.K. Mahajan, aged about 59 years, Gender Male, Son of not known to
                  the petitioner, The Additional Chief Secretary cum Principal Secretary,
                  Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            3.    Sri Jai Shankar Prasad Thakur, aged about ...... years, Gender Male, Son of
                  not known to the petitioner, the District Education Officer, Saharsa.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Parties
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Advocate
                                           :       Mr. Keshav Kumar Jha, Advocate
                                           :       Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc 16)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    13-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    counsel for the Respondent-State.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rahul

                    Kumar junior counsel to Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha submits that

                    he is under instruction to withdraw the present writ application.

                                  3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.