Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Swity Kumari @ Sweety KumariversusRahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition for transfer is dismissed as no useful purpose would be served by moving the case.

Summary

The petitioner sought transfer of Matrimonial Case No.81 of 2021 from the Family Court in Bhagalpur to the Family Court in Khagaria, alleging that the wife faced difficulty traveling between the two districts. The opposite party contended that three witnesses had already been examined and only one additional witness would be examined via video conferencing, indicating that the case could proceed without transfer. The court examined the pleadings and the record, noting that the remaining witness could be examined through video conferencing. It held that transferring the matter would not serve any useful purpose. Consequently, the petition for transfer was dismissed, and the case will continue in the Bhagalpur Family Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition for transfer of the matrimonial case from Bhagalpur Family Court to Khagaria Family Court should be granted on the ground of the wife's difficulty in attending court.

Subjects

  • family law
  • transfer of suit
  • jurisdiction
  • video conferencing
  • witness examination
  • convenience of parties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.503 of 2022
                 ======================================================
                 Swity Kumari @ Sweety Kumari W/o Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh D/o Raj
                 Kumar Singh resident of Village Karna, Post Parbatta Parbatta, District -
                 Khagariya.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh Son of Jagdish Singh Singh Resident of Village
                 Mill Tola, Naugachiya Police Station Naugachiya District Bhagalpur.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Anupa Nand Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   31-03-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The present matrimonial case has been filed for

                   transfer of Matrimonial Case No.81 of 2021 from the court of

                   learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to the court of

                   learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Khagaria on the ground

                   that since the opposite party/wife is a lady and she has difficulty

                   in attending the day to day court affairs by travelling from

                   Khagaria to Bhagalpur.

                                3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   opposite party by referring to his counter affidavit submits that

                   three witnesses have already been examined and he intends to

                   examine only one witness. It is further submitted that the

                   witness, namely, Sushil Kumar Singh was examined and cross-

                   examined by the learned Family Court through video
           Patna High Court MJC No.503 of 2022(4) dt.31-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     conferencing. The learned counsel for the opposite party further

                     submits that he will be examining only one witness on the next

                     date fixed in the matrimonial case through video conferencing

                     and thereafter he does not intend to examine any other witness.

                                  4. Having taken into consideration the facts, pleadings

                     advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and after going

                     through the records, this Court finds that three witnesses have

                     already been examined and the learned counsel for the opposite

                     party is ready and willing to examine only one witness through

                     video conferencing on the next date of hearing.

                                  5. Let the same be done and no useful purpose would

                     be served in transferring the matter from the court of learned

                     Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to the court of learned

                     Principal Judge, Family Court, Khagaria.

                                  6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed.


                                                 (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.