Patna High Court
Shiv Dayal ThakurversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. (PRE-EMPTORY)
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑compliance with the earlier court order.
Summary
Shiv Dayal Thakur filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Cane Development Department. The petition sought relief, but the court had earlier issued an order on 16‑01‑2026 requiring the petitioner to comply with certain directions. The petitioner failed to comply with that earlier order. On 18‑03‑2026, the learned counsel for both sides appeared before the court. The court observed the non‑compliance and dismissed the petition, thereby terminating the proceedings.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s failure to comply with the earlier order dated 16‑01‑2026 warrants dismissal of the writ petition
Subjects
- civil writ jurisdiction
- non‑compliance
- case dismissal
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5078 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18147 of 2011
======================================================
Shiv Dayal Thakur Son of Late Girija Thakur Resident Of Village-
Puroshottampur Sawarna, P.O.-Haraji (Dighwara), Police Station-Awatar
Nagar, District-Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Cane Commissioner Cane Development Department of Industries,
Bihar, Patna.
3. The Assistant Cane Commissioner, Development Directorate, Department of
Industries, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Joint Agriculture Director Plant Protection, Bihar, Patna.
5. The Deputy Director, Cane Development, Motihari Region, Motihari.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satya Narayan Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha (Aag 7)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 18-03-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the opposite party are present.
2. For non-compliance of previous order dated
16.01.2026, the case is dismissed.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Prakash Narayan
U
Checking your session…