Patna High Court
Mukesh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar through Shri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The application is dismissed as it has become infructuous due to compliance with the order.
Summary
Petitioner Mukesh Sharma filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief, alleging that a prior order had not been complied with. The respondent State of Bihar and its officials contended that the order had been fully complied with. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ashok Kumar, submitted that the order was indeed complied with, rendering the application moot. The Court examined whether the application remained maintainable in view of compliance. Finding that the purpose of the application was defeated, the Court held the petition infructuous. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition remains maintainable after the order sought to be enforced has been complied with?
Subjects
- civil writ jurisdiction
- application dismissed
- infructuous
- order compliance
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.520 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4142 of 2024
======================================================
Mukesh Sharma Son of Bameshwar Sharma, Resident of Village- Dehuni,
P.S. - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Shri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary Son of not known
to the Petitioner presently posted as the Principal Secretary cum Additional
Chief Secretary Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Smti Alankrita Pandey Wife of not known to the Petitioner presently posted
as District Magistrate Jahanabad, Bihar.
3. Shri Arvind Pratap Singh, Son of not known to the Petitioner presently
posted as Superintendent of Police Jahanabad, Bihar.
4. Shri Dadan Prasad Son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as
Station House Officer, Ghoshi, District - Jahanabad Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Advocate 2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 18-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
order has been complied.
3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U
Checking your session…