Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sant Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The contempt petition was disposed of on the ground that the matter had become infructuous.

Summary

Sant Om Prakash filed a contempt petition before the Patna High Court seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against several officials of the State of Bihar for allegedly willfully disobeying an order dated 07‑01‑2021 in CWJC No. 8382 of 2020. The petitioner requested that the court enforce compliance with that order. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the dispute had become infructuous, i.e., the alleged contempt no longer existed. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the contempt petition without further proceedings. No substantive examination of the alleged contempt was undertaken.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a contempt petition becomes infructuous before the court can entertain it?

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • infructuous petition
  • Civil Writ Jurisdiction
  • High Court
  • order compliance

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.584 of 2022
                                                       In
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8382 of 2020
                 ======================================================
                 Sant Om Prakash Son of Late Sadho Prasad Resident of Village- Bele Bakaur,
                 P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Sri Narmdeshwar Lal, the Principal Secretary,
                 Animal and Fish Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Srimati Madhurani Thakur, The Joint Secretary, Animal and Fish Resources
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Srimati Madhurani Thakur, The Additiona Secretary, Animal and Fish
                 Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    Sri Kasvendra Kumar, The Special Secretary, Animal and Fish Resources
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Director, Dairy Development Directorate, Bihar,
                 Patna.
           6.    Sri Ajay Kumar Jha, The Enquiry Officer-cum-Deputy Director (Dairy),
                 Dairy Development Directorate, Headquarter, Bihar, Patna.
           7.    Sri Satyanarayan Singh, The District Dairy Development Officer,
                 Madhubani.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   05-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                    against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

                                    willful disobedience of the order dated 07.01.2021

                                    passed in CWJC No. 8382 of 2020.”
            Patna High Court MJC No.584 of 2022(3) dt.05-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the

                      petitioner that the matter has become infructuous.

                                   4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands

                      disposed of.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.