Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Usha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of.

Summary

Petitioner Usha Kumari filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the State of Bihar and several education officials for alleged willful disobedience of an order dated 13‑02‑2020 passed in CWJC No. 8128 of 2015. The opposite parties filed a show‑cause notice, and the State counsel relied on memo No. 332 dated 01‑03‑2021 issued by the Regional Deputy Director, indicating that the petitioner’s representation had already been disposed of. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to raise any further grievance if it still existed, and consequently dismissed the contempt petition as disposed. The order effectively closed the contempt proceedings without further adjudication on the alleged disobedience.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate remedy when a petitioner's earlier representation has been disposed of?
  • Whether the contempt petition can proceed despite the alleged prior disposal of the petitioner's grievance.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ jurisdiction
  • education department
  • petition disposal
  • procedural law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.630 of 2021
                                                       In
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8128 of 2015
                 ======================================================
                 Usha Kumari W/o Shri Maheshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-
                 Chiraura, P.S. Naubatpur, District-Patna, at present residing at Flat No. 303,
                 Surya Sumitra Sadan, Lane No. 7, Arya Samaj Mandir Road, Opposite R.P.S.
                 More, Bailey Road, Patna.


                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan the Principal Secretary,
                 Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    Mr. Giriwar Dayal Singh the Director, Secondary Edcucation, Education
                 Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    Mr. Surendra Kumar Sinha the Regional Deputy Director of Education,
                 Patna Division, Patna.
           4.    Mr. Jyoti Kumar, The District Education Officer, Patna.
           5.    Smt. Kiran, the Acting Headmistress, Project Girls High School Naubatpur
                 (Nagwan), P.S.-Naubatpur, District-Patna.


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Ram Sagar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15
                                        :      Mr. S.S. Tiwary, AC to AAG-15
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   05-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             “for initiation of contempt proceeding

                                    against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

                                    willful disobedience of the order dated 13.02.2020

                                    passed in CWJC No. 8128 of 2015.”
            Patna High Court MJC No.630 of 2021(3) dt.05-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite

                      party and learned State counsel has taken this Court to the

                      memo. no. 332 dated 01.03.2021 issued by the Regional Deputy

                      Director, Education Department, Patna Division, Patna which

                      shows that the representation of the petitioner stands disposed

                      of.

                                   4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the

                      matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt

                      petition stands disposed of.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.