Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amoda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that no contempt had occurred as the order dated 16‑01‑2020 was complied with.

Summary

Amoda Devi filed an application seeking a rule of contempt against the State of Bihar and its officials, alleging willful and deliberate disobedience of an order dated 16‑01‑2020 issued by Hon’ble Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh in C.W.J.C. No. 24400 of 2019. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order had been complied with. The Court examined whether the opposite parties had committed contempt by failing to obey the earlier judgment. Finding that the order was complied with, the Court held that there was no contempt. Consequently, the contempt application (MJC No. 684 of 2021) was disposed of without any further direction.

Issues considered

  • Did the opposite parties willfully disobey and fail to comply with the order dated 16‑01‑2020 in C.W.J.C. No. 24400 of 2019, thereby committing contempt of court?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • willful disobedience
  • order compliance
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.684 of 2021
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24400 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Amoda Devi Wife of Late Asarfi Dhanuk Resident of Village- Raypura, P.O.-
                 Chatmadih, P.S.- Shambhuganj, District- Banka, (Bihar).

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary namely Amir Subhnai,
                 Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The District Magistrate Namely Suharsh Bhagat, Banka, District.
           3.    The Sub- Divisional Magistrate Namely S.K. Singh Shambhuganj, Banka.
           4.    Sunil Kumar The Regional Manager, UCO Bank, Regional Office,
                 Adampur, Bhagalpur.
           5.    Praveen Kr. Singh The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :   Mr. Lalit Narayan Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :   Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma (Aag 3)
                 For the AG, Bihar        :   Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
                                              Mrs. Vijeta Kumari, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The present application has been preferred for:

                                              “issuance of Rule of Contempt against

                                   the Contemnor-Opposite Parties for their willful

                                   and deliberate disobedience and non-compliance

                                   of order dated 16.01.2020 passed by Hon’ble Mr.

                                   Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh in C.W.J.C. No.

                                   24400 of 2019 whereby and where under his

                                   Lordship was pleased to disposed of the Writ
             Patna High Court MJC No.684 of 2021(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                                       Petition with observation and direction.”

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                       order stands complied.

                                    4. In that background, MJC No. 684 of 2021 stands

                       disposed of.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
atul/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.