Patna High Court
Ajit Kumar Roy and OrsversusSatyanand Sharma and Ors.
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The petition was withdrawn and the court disposed of the matter without deciding the contempt issue.
Summary
The petitioners, a group of brothers, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to initiate contempt proceedings against the opposite parties for allegedly violating an injunction dated 14 January 2008 issued in FA No. 661 of 1994. The petition sought a court order to commence contempt action. During the hearing on 10 March 2026, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the dispute had been compromised and the petitioners wished to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the matter without adjudicating the contempt claim. Consequently, no substantive ruling on the alleged contempt was made.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to initiate contempt proceedings against the opposite parties for alleged breach of the 14 January 2008 injunction
Subjects
- contempt of court
- injunction
- withdrawal of petition
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.699 of 2016
======================================================
1. Ajit Kumar Roy Son of Ramchritra Roy
2. Anil kumar Roy
3. Binod kumar Roy
4. Abhay Kumar Roy
5. Sanjay Kumar Roy @ Sanjay Kumar
6. Binay Kumar Roy @ Binay Kumar
7. Rajesh Kumar Roy All Sons of Sri Ajit Kumar Roy. All resident of village-
Sarai Ranjan Dih, p.o and p.s.- Sarai ranjan, District- Samastipur, Presently
resident of Mohlla- Karimabad, Mogardshi, Samastipur, P.O. and P.S.-
District Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Satyanand Sharma
2. Navin Kumar Sharma @ Achitanand Sharma Both sons of Shanti devi And
all resident of village- Sarai Ranjan Dih, P.O. and P.S.- Sarai Ranjan,
District- Samastipur.
3. Guddu @ Mamta kumari D/O Shanti Devi Resident of village Sarai Ranjan
Dih, P.O and P. S- Sarai Ranjan District- Samastipur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate
: Mr. Satya Veer, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 10-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
grant of following relief(s):
“for initiating the contempt
proceeding against the opposite parties no. 1
and 2 for their gross violation of the injunction
Patna High Court MJC No.699 of 2016(3) dt.10-03-2026
2/2
order dated 14.01.2008 passed by the Hon’ble
Court in F.A. No. 661 of 1994.”
3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the
petitioners that the matter has been compromised and as such,
he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Accordingly, the MJC No. 699 of 2016 is disposed
of as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U
Checking your session…