Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amrendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is not maintainable and is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Amrendra Kumar filed a criminal writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar. The court identified a defect concerning the maintainability of the petition. Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the case, seeking liberty to pursue appropriate legal steps later. The State's counsel was present but made no objection to the withdrawal. The court, acknowledging the defect and the petitioner's request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to take further steps as per law.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition is maintainable before the High Court

Subjects

  • maintainability
  • withdrawal
  • criminal writ jurisdiction
  • high court
  • petition dismissal

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.954 of 2019
                                                         In
                                 Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.243 of 2017
                  ======================================================
                  Amrendra Kumar S/o Late Ganesh Paswan. Resident of Village and P.O.-
                  Baraila, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar through Department of Vigilance, Bihar.
            2.    The State of Bihar through Superintendent of Police, District- Rohtas at
                  Sasram.
            3.    District Programme Officer, Establishment, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Daya Shankar Prasad Sinha, Adv
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3
                                                   Ms. Neetu Jha, AC to GA12
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

9    19-01-2026                     In view of the defect pointed out by the office

                    regarding maintainability of the present case, learned counsel

                    for the petitioner prays for withdrawing the case with liberty to

                    take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the State is present is present.

                                 3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn

                    with liberty as aforesaid.



                                               (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.