Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KOLI MANJULABEN KISHANBHAI (NEE, RATHVA MANJULABEN CHHATRASINH)versusNAYKA VIJAYBHAI NANIYABHAI

Disposal
33-CA DISPOSED OF

Holding

The Court disposed of the leave to appeal application, refusing to grant a review, as the matter was already finally decided by the authority.

Summary

The applicant, Koli Manjulaben Kishanbhai, filed a leave to appeal application seeking permission to file a review against the judgment dated 23 March 2026 in Special Civil Application No.4001 of 2026. The respondent No.1, represented by Mr. Nishit P. Gandhi, produced a copy of a final order dated 22 May 2026 issued by the concerned authority after the court’s judgment. The respondent argued that the matter had already been finally decided by the authority, rendering a review unnecessary. The Court examined the submission and took the copy of the final order on record. Finding that the issue was already resolved, the Court disposed of the leave to appeal application without granting review. No statutory provisions or precedents were cited.

Issues considered

  • Whether a review application should be entertained when the concerned authority has already passed a final order after the court’s judgment.

Subjects

review applicationleave to appealcivil procedurefinal orderdisposal

Judgment

     C/CA/1823/2026                                ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

  R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 1823 of 2026

                 In F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION/11357/2026
                In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/4001/2026

==========================================================
    KOLI MANJULABEN KISHANBHAI (NEE, RATHVA MANJULABEN
                       CHHATRASINH)
                          Versus
             NAYKA VIJAYBHAI NANIYABHAI & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KB PUJARA(680) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
AISHVARYA(8018) for the Respondent(s) No. 5
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
MR TIRTH H SHAH(13975) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR. NISHIT P GANDHI(6946) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                             Date : 12/06/2026

                              ORAL ORDER

      Present application is preferred by the applicant
seeking leave to prefer Review Application against the
judgment and order dated 23.03.2026 passed in Special
Civil Application No.4001 of 2026.
      Today, Mr. Nishit P. Gandhi, learned counsel for
respondent No. 1, produced on record the copy of final
order     dated        22.05.2026    passed      by      the    concerned
authority        and     submitted      that,    after     order       dated
23.03.2026 passed by this Court, the authority heard the
concerned parties and passed the order. He, therefore,
submitted present application may be disposed of.


                                 Page 1 of 2
        C/CA/1823/2026                                                              ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




         The copy of the order dated 22.5.2026 passed by the
concerned authority is taken on record.
         In view of the above submission, present application
stands disposed of.


                                                                        (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
SURESH SOLANKI
 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
 Digitally signed by: SURESHKUMAR MOTIBHAI SOLANKI(HC00208), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 15/06/2026 17:40:48




                                                       Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "review application"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.